
Posted date | 26th May, 2025 | Last date to apply | 30th June, 2025 |
Country | Pakistan | Locations | Peshawar |
Category | Research | ||
Type | Consultancy | Positions | 2 |
Experience | 5 years |
KP TA - Support for District Health Offices and National Health Support Programme in the Development of Integrated District Health Action Plans in Selected Districts
Programme Overview
Evidence for Health (E4H) is a Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO)-funded programme aimed at strengthening Pakistan's healthcare system, thereby decreasing the burden of illness and saving lives. E4H provides technical assistance (TA) to the Federal, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP), and Punjab governments, and is being implemented by Palladium along with Oxford Policy Management (OPM).
Through its flexible, embedded, and demand-driven model, E4H supports the government to achieve a resilient health system that is prepared for health emergencies, responsive to the latest evidence, and delivers equitable, quality, and efficient healthcare services. Specifically, E4H delivers TA across three outputs:
Output 1: Strengthened integrated health security, with a focus on preparing and responding to health emergencies, including pandemics.
Output 2: Strengthened evidence-based decision-making to drive health sector performance and accountability.
Output 3: Improved implementation of Universal Health Coverage, with a focus on ending preventable deaths.
Position Summary
The primary objectives of developing an integrated DAP on health include:
- Gather and triangulate relevant data from multiple sources to assess the district’s health status, including disease burden, service coverage, workforce capacity, infrastructure, and resource availability.
- Ensure alignment of district health priorities with national and provincial policies, including the EPHS.
- Identify priority health interventions using available data and a participatory, stakeholder-driven process.
- Optimise the allocation of financial and human resources to maximise health service delivery and outcomes.
- Strengthen district health management and coordination mechanisms to support effective and responsive health service delivery.
- Develop and implement a M&E framework to track progress, assess impact, and inform adaptive management of the plan
Scope of Work and Methodology
The technical assistance will focus on building capacity and providing hands-on support at both the facility and DHO levels. The team will work in close coordination with the DHPMTs and district stakeholders, ensuring ownership, capacity transfer, and sustainability.
The approach will combine technical guidance, participatory planning, and continuous engagement focused on review, dialogue, and capacity strengthening at the district and facility levels. The team will engage closely with DHOs, key health programme staff, local government stakeholders, and development partners to ensure inclusive planning and ownership, while also coordinating with allied sectors and relevant government departments such as finance, and planning and development to foster alignment and collaboration.
The process will include a comprehensive review of relevant policy documents, plans, and program guidelines; stakeholder meetings at district and provincial levels to build consensus and align efforts; in-depth interviews with DHOs, program managers, frontline health workers, and community representatives to gather contextual insights and identify local priorities; thematic consultations and validation workshops to co-develop and refine Integrated DAP and continuous coordination with allied sectors and government departments (e.g., finance, planning, local government) to promote multisectoral alignment.
Key Areas of Work
Preparation and Coordination for Planning
- Support the re-notification of DHPMTs, ensuring representation from key health programs, allied sectors, Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), and development partners.
- Revise DHPMT Terms of Reference (TOR) to clarify objectives, deliverables, roles, and reporting mechanisms.
- Establish clear timelines, communication protocols, and responsibility matrices to guide the planning process.
Review and Alignment with Policy Guidelines
- Desk review of the federal and provincial policies, including National Health Vision, KP Health Policy & Strategic Plan, EPHS, UHC Roadmap, and other relevant strategic documents.
- Desk Review of the vertical programs such as Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn, Child, and Adolescent Health & Family Planning (RMNCAH & FP), Tuberculosis (TB), Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI), Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Hepatitis and others alongside government performance frameworks such as the Medium-Term Budgetary Framework (MTBF), donor commitments, and PC-I targets. This review will help to identify the key performance indicators of each programme, understand funding allocations and list specific deliverables such as target immunization coverage, contraceptive prevalence rate, skilled birth attendance targets, TB case detection and treatment success rates etc.
Data Collection and Triangulation
At the outset of DAP development, a comprehensive data collection process is critical to ensure that planning is evidence-based, context-specific, and responsive to the actual needs of the population and health system.
- Gather and triangulate data from a variety of reliable sources to develop an accurate evidence base for the district. This includes:
- Routinely collected data from the District Health Information System (DHIS2),
- Logistics Management Information System (LMIS) for supply chain and stock availability,
- Vital statistics, including birth and death registration,
- Census and demographic data for population estimates and catchment area profiling,
- Facility assessments and survey reports (e.g., Service Availability and Readiness Assessment (SARA), Health Facility Assessment (HFA), Maternal, and Newborn, and Child Health (MNCH) assessments,
- Community-based data sources, including Lady Health Worker (LHW) program reports.
- Supplement quantitative data with qualitative insights through:
- Focus group discussions (FGDs) with community members and service users,
- Key informant interviews (KIIs) with district health officials, facility managers, LHWs, and other frontline health workers,
- Direct observations of service delivery, infrastructure, and client flow in selected health facilities.
- Conduct Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) analysis and bottleneck assessments using World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) health systems building blocks to identify critical gaps and constraints related to service delivery, Human Resources (HR), infrastructure, medicines, health information systems, governance, and financing.
- Use collected data to develop district-specific equity profiles and dashboard-style summaries, highlighting disparities in access, coverage, and health outcomes by geography, gender, and population group. This will help prioritize interventions aligned with the EPHS and ensure that planning decisions are targeted and inclusive.
Review and Assessment of Available Resources
- Conduct a comprehensive assessment of past and current financial allocations to the Department of Health, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, including the Annual Development Programme (ADP) and recurrent budgets.
- Analyze external donor funding streams such as those from the World Bank (NHSP, HCIP, Primary Revamp), Gavi, the Global Fund, United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), WHO, and other bilateral or multilateral partners supporting health systems strengthening in KP.
- Assess the flexibility and sustainability of these funding sources, including conditionalities, timelines, and alignment with provincial health priorities.
- Review existing human resource deployment, infrastructure adequacy, availability of essential supplies and medicines, and the reliability of M&E systems to identify systemic strengths and bottlenecks.
- Map ongoing and planned interventions funded through both domestic and external sources to identify overlaps, complementarities, and critical gaps particularly in relation to priority areas such as primary health care, immunization, maternal and child health, nutrition, and disease control programs.
Design of Interventions
Develop evidence-based and context-specific interventions that address the priority health needs of the population, with a focus on improving access, quality, and equity in service delivery.
- Interventions will be prioritized based on the EPHS approved for KP, ensuring alignment with provincial health policy and service delivery.
- For each selected intervention, a detailed description will be provided covering:
- Infrastructure requirements, including facility upgrades or establishment of new service delivery points.
- Human resource needs, specifying required staff categories, deployment plans, and capacity-building measures.
- Medical equipment and supplies, aligned with EPHS service delivery standards.
- Essential medicines, with emphasis on availability, quantification, and alignment with the provincial Essential Medicines List.
- Health system enablers, including:
- Strengthening of supply chain and procurement systems for timely and efficient delivery of commodities.
- Enhancement of HIS for accurate data collection, analysis, and decision-making.
- Robust M&E mechanisms to track performance, measure outcomes, and support adaptive management.
- All interventions will be designed to be gender-responsive, equity-focused, and culturally appropriate, with particular attention to the needs of underserved populations, including those in remote and conflict-affected areas.
- The design process will also incorporate WHO’s health systems building blocks to ensure a comprehensive and sustainable approach to health system strengthening.
Setting Plan Objectives & Targets
- Translate prioritized interventions—based on the approved EPHS for KP into SMART objectives that reflect the intended service delivery and health system improvements.
- Define a comprehensive set of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)across the results chain, including:
- Inputs (e.g., infrastructure upgrades, human resource deployment, equipment and supply availability),
- Align with the UHC M&E frameworks, ensuring that monitoring tools and indicators reflect EPHS implementation priorities and WHO’s health systems building blocks.
- Integrate routine data from DHIS-2, LMIS, and other digital platforms to support timely performance tracking, gap identification, and evidence-based course correction.
- Outputs (e.g., service coverage, patient utilization, availability of essential medicines),
- Outcomes (e.g., improved health status indicators, equity in access, quality of care).
- Targets will be disaggregated by district, facility type (e.g., Basic Health Unit (BHU), Rural Health Centre (RHC), Tehsil Headquarter Hospital (THQ), District Headquarter Hospital (DHQ), and population groups (e.g., women, children, adolescents, marginalized populations) to ensure equity and address geographic disparities.
Assessment of Resource Requirements & Alignment with Available Resources
- Undertake a comprehensive costing of prioritized interventions—guided by the approved EPHS for KP using both input-based (e.g., HR, infrastructure, equipment, medicines, systems strengthening) and activity-based/program-based budgeting approaches to ensure transparency and feasibility.
- Align costed interventions with existing financial resources from key funding streams, including the NHSP, HCIP, Primary Health Care Revamp Program, Sehat Card Plus, ADP, and relevant donor-funded programs (e.g., World Bank, Gavi, Global Fund, UNICEF).
- Identify funding gaps across service packages and health system components, including supply chain, M&E, digital health, and capacity building.
- Develop targeted advocacy and resource mobilization strategies to bridge funding gaps, with a focus on:
- Leveraging domestic resources through enhanced public financial management.
- Engaging with development partners for catalytic funding.
- Performance-based financing aligned with DLI commitments.
- Ensure that budgeting processes reflect equity considerations, especially for underserved districts and vulnerable population groups, and support sustainable financing for EPHS implementation at both provincial and district levels.
Enhancing Management and Organizational Systems
- Reassess and strengthen governance and management structures at the district level to support effective implementation of the EPHS in KP.
- Clearly define and streamline roles, responsibilities, and accountability mechanisms across the District Health Offices, health facility management, and relevant cross-sectoral departments (e.g., Finance, Planning & Development, Local Government).
- Revise and update Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs), job descriptions, and organizational workflows to reflect EPHS service delivery requirements and ensure clarity in implementation and reporting lines.
- Establish and institutionalize performance management systems, including:
- Regular performance reviews based on key indicators linked to EPHS priorities.
- Supportive supervision mechanisms to improve service quality and staff accountability at all levels of care.
- Use of digital tools and dashboards to monitor facility-level performance and enable timely decision-making.
- Promote interdepartmental coordination and introduce mechanisms for joint planning, implementation oversight, and problem-solving across health system components such as HR, procurement, supply chain, and health information systems.
- Build leadership and management capacity through targeted training and mentoring programs, especially for district and facility managers, to drive systems change and ensure sustained implementation of prioritized interventions.
Designing the Financial Plan & Operational Plan
- Develop detailed financial plans based on the costing conducted, incorporating input-based, activity-based, and program-based budgeting. Ensure alignment with provincial financial frameworks.
- Prepare comprehensive budget tables covering all critical components, including:
- Infrastructure improvements,
- Human resources and capacity building,
- Procurement of equipment, supplies, and essential medicines,
- Health systems strengthening areas such as supply chain, health information systems, monitoring and evaluation, and governance.
- Include contingency allocations for potential health emergencies (e.g., disease outbreaks, natural disasters), ensuring system responsiveness and continuity of essential services.
- Develop a detailed operational plan, including:
- A structured activity matrix linked to each intervention, showing timelines, responsible units, and key outputs.
- A Gantt chart to visualize sequencing, dependencies, and implementation pace.
- A coordination calendar to facilitate alignment across departments, development partners, and vertical programs, and to schedule regular progress reviews.
- Ensure that the financial and operational plans are:
- Fully synchronized with the EPHS service delivery model,
- Feasible within the available fiscal space,
- Responsive to geographic and population-specific needs, and
- Designed to support accountability, transparency, and effective resource utilization at all levels of the health system.
Developing the Monitoring & Evaluation Plan
- Develop a comprehensive M&E plan fully aligned with the implementation of the EPHS and integrated into the existing M&E framework for KP.
- Establish a comprehensive results-based M&E framework that defines indicators across all levels of the results chain—inputs, processes, outputs, outcomes, and impact—linked to the prioritized EPHS interventions and health systems strengthening components (e.g., HR, supply chain, information systems, governance).
- Define clear data sources, reporting mechanisms, and feedback loops to ensure timely, accurate, and actionable information flow from health facilities to district and provincial levels. This includes leveraging digital platforms such as DHIS-2, LMIS for effective monitoring.
- Build institutional and human resource capacity for high-quality data collection, validation, analysis, and use at the provincial, district, and facility levels, enabling evidence-based decision-making and course correction.
- Establish regular review mechanisms, such as quarterly and annual performance reviews, supportive supervision visits, and stakeholder coordination meetings, to monitor progress, address bottlenecks, and document lessons learned.
- Incorporate equity-focused and gender-sensitive indicators to assess service coverage and outcomes across different population groups and geographies, supporting the goal of inclusive, accountable, and transparent EPHS implementation.
Responsibilities
The Research Associate Informatics will work to achieve the following:
- Support in establishment and operationalization of DHPMTs with updated TORs, coordination protocols, and responsibility matrix.
- Facilitate the desk review and synthesize findings into a structured matrix aligning policies, vertical programs, and performance frameworks.
- Support in development of the district health situation report, including data triangulation, SWOT analysis, and equity scorecards.
- Assist in developing Resource availability and gap analysis report
- Support in District Health Intervention and Results Framework aligned with EPHS, UHC, and WHO system building blocks.
- Support in the costing and budget plan, ensuring activity-based and program-based budgeting tied to prioritized interventions.
- Assist in the organizational strengthening plan with revised governance structures, SOPs, and performance systems.
- Support in the financial and operational plan with detailed budget tables, Gantt charts, and coordination calendars.
- Assist in developing the monitoring and evaluation framework, integrating KPIs, reporting tools, and feedback mechanisms.
- Support in developing the draft integrated DAP for health
- Support in developing the final DAP report.
- Record minutes, coordinate with stakeholders and ensure follow ups where required.
Timeline and Days
The level of effort (LOE) for the role is 70 days, from June 2025 to October 2026.
Requirement
Technical Expertise
- Bachelor’s in public health, Health Sciences, Development Studies, Social Sciences, or a related field.
- 5 years of experience.
- Experience in conducting desk reviews, synthesizing technical information, and supporting the development of structured matrices and reports.
- Skilled in documentation, coordination, and providing technical assistance across health planning and governance workstreams.
- Proficient in Microsoft Office tools (especially Word, Excel, and PowerPoint), with the ability to support analysis and presentation of findings.
- Knowledge of district health systems, including roles of DHMTs, governance structures, and service delivery models.
- Ability to assist in developing strategic plans, resource gap analyses, and organizational strengthening documents.
Competencies
- Strong coordination, communication, and stakeholder engagement skills.
- Excellent organizational and time management abilities to handle multiple tasks efficiently.
- Detail-oriented with good writing skills for technical documentation and reporting.
- Collaborative mindset and the ability to support diverse teams in fast-paced environments.
- Proactive and responsive, with a commitment to supporting effective and inclusive planning processes.
Requirements
- Resume attachment is required.
Z.M.K. & Co. invites applications for the position of Research Analyst to support the ....
Project Title: Restora....